72
Co-Learning Practice Score / 100
487
Lived-Experience Engaged
Your Co-Learning Strategy is the collective implementation of co-learning — collecting feedback from people with lived experience, analyzing what the feedback means for programs and policies, engaging in co-learning discussions, reflecting on and documenting learnings, and planning updates in response. The metrics below show how that work is progressing across your portfolio.
View Full Dashboard →
🤝
14
Active Co-Learning Partners
↑ 2 added this quarter
📊
87%
Outcome Reporting Rate
↑ 12% vs Q1 — outcomes over outputs
📞
38
Co-Learning Sessions
↑ 12 this quarter across 3 tiers
🎯
72
Co-Learning Practice Score
↑ +6 from Q1 — Growing practice
The measurement framework PI ROI uses to track outcomes produced through the Co-Learning Strategy — across survivor, grantee, and community/systems spheres. Dimensions activated for this engagement; entries aggregated across all active partners.
| Dimension |
Total Entries |
Outcomes |
% High Attribution |
Partners Active |
Status |
| D1 Safety & Wellbeing of Survivors, Children, Families |
62 |
58 |
81% |
14 of 14 |
All partners |
| D2 Access to Resources and Opportunities |
54 |
48 |
78% |
14 of 14 |
All partners |
| D3 Health and Behavioral Health Outcomes |
31 |
28 |
74% |
9 of 14 |
Partial portfolio |
| D4 Community Participatory Practice |
42 |
36 |
88% |
14 of 14 |
All partners |
| D5 Culturally Responsive Service Quality |
38 |
34 |
82% |
13 of 14 |
Partial portfolio |
| D6 Organizational Capacity for Sustained Care |
29 |
24 |
76% |
14 of 14 |
All partners |
| D7 Systems Change and Institutional Accountability |
24 |
22 |
92% |
8 of 14 |
Partial portfolio |
| D8 Community Conditions and Social Determinants |
0 |
0 |
— |
0 of 14 |
Not activated |
A 0-100 score measuring the quality of your Co-Learning Strategy being practiced across the portfolio. Five drivers reward lived-experience voice, meaningful engagement, co-learning practice, outcomes over outputs, and attribution honesty — the practices that produce genuine change for survivors, children, families, and communities.
Portfolio Co-Learning Practice Score
72
/ 100
Growing Practice
D1: Lived-Experience Voice in Measurement
68
D2: Meaningful Engagement
78
D3: Co-Learning Practice
74
D4: Outcomes Over Outputs
89
D5: Attribution Honesty
65
📊 Embedded Google Sheets Chart
Safety and Wellbeing Outcomes Activity Across Portfolio
Where grantee partners are focusing their co-learning work · Q2 2026
Community Participation
42
Cultural Responsiveness
38
📊 Embedded Google Sheets Chart
Outcome Reporting Rate — Cohort-Wide
Q2 2026 · 280 total entries · 87% outcomes vs. 13% outputs
| Organization |
Service Type |
Co-Learning Status |
Active Dimensions |
Co-Learning Practice Score |
Last Check-In |
| RTRising Together Alliance |
Coalition |
On Track |
7 of 8 |
74 |
Apr 14, 2026 |
| CVCommunity Voices Project |
Advocacy |
On Track |
6 of 8 |
78 |
Apr 10, 2026 |
| HPHealing Pathways |
Direct Service |
Needs Attention |
5 of 8 |
61 |
Mar 28, 2026 |
| TWTribal Wellness Collaborative |
Capacity Building |
On Track |
7 of 8 |
82 |
Apr 16, 2026 |
| RCRegional Coalition |
Coalition |
Delayed |
4 of 8 |
52 |
Mar 12, 2026 |
| PEPaz de Esperanza |
Direct Service |
On Track |
6 of 8 |
75 |
Apr 11, 2026 |
| RIReclaim Institute |
Capacity Building |
New Partner |
3 of 8 |
— |
Apr 17, 2026 |
| HSHorizon Safe Haven |
Direct Service |
On Track |
6 of 8 |
68 |
Apr 15, 2026 |
How people with lived experience of the services and programs being funded are engaged across grantee partners. Grantees report aggregate information; individual survey data stays with grantees in their local context.
487
People with Lived Experience Engaged
Total number of people engaged across grantee partners through advisory councils, focus groups, surveys, program design sessions, and peer leadership roles.
2,340
Surveys Received from People with Lived Experience
Total surveys received by grantees from people with lived experience this quarter. Grantees administer surveys and report aggregate counts; individual responses stay with grantees.
42
Narrative Entries
Qualitative voice as measurement — quoted with consent, treated as data, not decoration.
📅 Embedded Google Calendar — sessions across the three co-learning tiers.
The Data Blues Conversation
Tier 2 Co-Learning · Foundation + DVE + Grantees
Live Event
Q1 Review — Regional Coalition
Follow-up Check-In · Google Meet
Check-In
Q2 Cohort Mid-Point Review
Tier 1 Session · Foundation + DVE only
Review
Lived-Experience Interpretation Session
Tier 3 Co-Learning · Foundation + Grantees + Advisory Board
Live Event